The software development process involves iterative planning, design, coding, testing, and deployment phases, with continuous feedback integration and issue resolution until the final product is ready for release.
The pseudo-code is below. Honestly, I think code review is not necessary.
while (has an idea, requirements, or design document?())
{
do {
make a technical design document();
TDD review();
} while (has unaddressed review comments?());
add tasks in issue tracking software();
while (has tasks?()) {
auto state = State::implementation;
while (state != State::done) {
switch (state)
{
case State::implementation: implement(); break;
case State::compilation: fix compilation errors and warnings(); break;
case State::static analysis: fix static analysis warnings(); break;
case State::automated test: fix automated test issues(); break;
case State::dev testing: fix issues from manual testing(); break;
case State::code review: address code review comments(); break;
case State::QA: fix bugs(); break;
case State::production: address user feedback(); break;
}
compile();
if (has errors or warnings?()) { state = State::compilation; continue; }
static analysis();
if (has static analysis warnings?()) { state = State::static analysis; continue; }
run unit test and integration test();
if (has automated test issues?()) { state = State::automated test; continue; }
test manually();
if (has issues from manual testing?()) { state = State::dev testing; continue; }
code review();
if (has unresolved code review comments?()) { state = State::code review; continue; }
merge to the main branch();
deploy to staging environment();
QA();
if (has bugs?()) { state = State::QA; continue; }
deploy to test production environment();
if (has issues and unaddressed user feedback?()) { state = State::production; continue; }
worldwide deployment();
state = State::done;
}
}
}